IR25 29 November 1994 OFFSHORE FUNDS: SIMPLIFICATION MEASURES The Chancellor proposes in his Budget to make two changes to the offshore funds legislation, so that: the legislation will no longer apply to entities that are not "collective investment schemes" as defined in the Financial Services Act; funds with very low gross income will not need to incur the administrative cost of distributing it to satisfy the "distribution test". The Chancellor's intention is to simplify the offshore funds legislation and ease compliance burdens, for certain cases where the present rules are unnecessarily onerous. The first of the two measures will apply as from today and the second for account periods of funds ending on or after today. NOTES FOR EDITORS 1. The Offshore Funds legislation was introduced in 1984. It applies to a wide range of investment vehicles set up outside the United Kingdom. These often take the form of an 'open-ended' investment company, where the investors' holding consists of shares, or a unit trust type of arrangement, where the investor holds units. 2. The legislation makes a distinction between funds which distribute most of their income to investors ("distributor" funds), and funds which accumulate the income in the fund until investors realise their holdings ("roll-up" funds). Investors in a "distributor" fund that meets certain conditions and is certified by the Inland Revenue are liable to capital gains tax on the gains made on disposal of their holdings. In a "roll-up" fund investors are charged to income tax on the disposal proceeds. 3. Under the first of the Chancellor's proposals, entities that are not collective investment schemes within the definition in the Financial Services Act 1986 would be removed entirely from the scope of the offshore funds legislation. This is intended to apply to certain types of commercial structures used by international groups, which are not created as vehicles for rolling-up income but may technically be offshore funds as the legislation now stands. (Other offshore funds which are collective investment schemes will not be affected by this change.) 4. Under the second proposal, funds seeking Inland Revenue certification as "distributor" funds will be treated as having met the distribution test where the gross income in a year is very low - and where the cost of distributing that income to investors would be disproportionate. At present this relaxation is only available where the annual income is nil. It is proposed that the de minimis limit will be set at 1 per cent of the average value of the fund's assets for the year in question. 5. These changes have been proposed following a review of the offshore funds legislation, suggested by a number of interested bodies, to find ways of simplifying it and easing compliance burdens for fund managers. The effect will be that the special income tax charge imposed by the legislation will no longer operate in a number of cases at the margins where it is reasonable that the provisions should not apply. Individual investors will not need to take any action to benefit from the changes. 6. The revenue cost of these measures will be negligible.