HM Treasury News Release

168/98                                       20 October 1998
------------------------------------------------------------

TIME RUNS OUT FOR SEVEN MORE FIRMS 

Further advances have been made towards completion of the first
phase of the reviews of personal pensions mis-selling.

The time limit for completion of phase 1 of the review, set by
the Personal Investment Authority (PIA), has expired for a
further seven firms: Albany Life, Allied Dunbar, Canada Life,
Gan, National Westminster, Royal London and Wesleyan. Consistent
with the treatment of the twelve firms already removed from the
Treasury's monthly list, the Economic Secretary, Patricia Hewitt
said:

     "These seven firms must continue to update me on their
     progress, but I now look to the PIA for its assessment of
     whether they have in fact met their targets. If they have,
     they will be removed from the list next month."

Of the 29 firms whose results are published today:

     four have resolved less than 75 per cent of their cases. All
     four are networks of independent financial advisers; and

     all firms have now resolved over 60 per cent of their cases.

While the Minister said she was pleased about the progress made
by the pensions firms, she stressed that the completion of cases,
as measured in the Treasury's published table, is not the end of
the process. She said:

     "With many firms close to their targets, it is now time for
     them to turn their attention from review to redress.  I want
     to see the redress agreed between firms and customers
     delivered as a matter of priority. After the appallingly
     slow start to the review, firms' credibility with their
     customers rests on a swift resolution."

The PIA is monitoring firms' follow up action to deliver redress,
and will take action against laggards where this is warranted.
The Minister stressed that investors should play their part and
respond in good time to any questions from firms. She also called
on occupational schemes to help by making every effort to speed
things along.

NOTES TO EDITORS

   1.The Economic Secretary published the figures in response
to a Parliamentary Question from Jackie Lawrence [Preseli
Pembrokeshire].

   2.The former Economic Secretary, Helen Liddell, said in
November 1997 that firms which have met their targets will
have their names removed from the list published by the
Treasury. In July (Treasury news release 116/98) 12 companies
were taken off the list. These were: AXA Equity & Law,
Barclays Life, Britannic Assurance, Commercial Union, Godwins,
Guardian, Lloyds TSB, Midland Bank, Norwich Union, Prudential,
Royal & Sun Alliance and United Assurance.

   3.The Personal Investment Authority (PIA) has levied fines
related to pensions mis-selling. These include:

     The M&E Network               Aug 97         #100,000
     DBS Financial Management      Sep 97         #425,000
     Friends Provident             Sep 97         #450,000
     Albany Life                   Nov 97         #375,000
     London & Manchester           Jan 98         #525,000
     Countrywide                   Feb 98         #250,000
     Britannic Assurance           Mar 98         #525,000
     Sun Life of Canada            Apr 98         #600,000
     Financial Options             Jun 98         #250,000
     Lincoln                       Jun 98         #70,000
     J&H Marsh and McLennan        Jun 98         #200,000
     Minet Consultancy Services    Jul 98         #250,000

   4.Also, in July August and September, the PIA fined 121
firms of independent financial advisers a total of #461,750.

   5.If you have access to the Internet, you can find this
news release and other Treasury information at http://www.hm-
treasury.gov.uk

PROGRESS BY PENSIONS FIRMS IN RESOLVING CASES OF PERSONAL
PENSIONS MIS-SELLING IN THE PERIOD TO THE END OF SEPTEMBER
1998.

50-75% of cases resolved

Countrywide     5,020   2,727    322    191     131   106    2    60
DBS             2,410     845    837    201     605   439   18    62
Financial
Options           554     294     74     26      48    35    6    64
Burns Anderson  1,267     420    512    219     293   230   18    69

Over 75% of cases resolved

IFA Network     378    120    166    111    55    54    14    75
Windsor Life  9,645  3,971  4,080    320 3,760 3,147    33    77
Abbey Life   17,733  6,106  8,680  1,251 7,429 6,573    37    79
Sun Life 
of Canada    28,848 10,276 13,887  2,572 11,315 10,046  35    79
Lincoln
National     13,533  2,178  9,909  1,377 8,532 7,206    53    80
London 
and 
Manchester    8,568  1,519  5,922    677 5,245 4,674    55    80
Gan          12,235  2,090  8,615    912 7,703 6,881    56    81
Hill Samuel   6,199    918  4,582    700 3,882 3,483    56    82
Standard Life 7,435    889  5,663  1,267 4,396 4,052    54    83
Colonial      8,732  3,119  4,952    587 4,365 3,652    42    84
Sedgwick     16,835  9,504  5,281  1,821 3,460 2,981    18    85
CIS          44,681  7,365 35,191 14,003 21,188 16,947  38    86
Friends
Provident     7,101  1,281  5,204    814 4,390 3,997    56    86
Berkeley 
Independent     185    122     42     29    13    11     6    88
Hogg Robinson 2,299    832  1,293    444   849   758    33    88
NatWest      15,396  4,852  9,727  1,266 8,461 7,575    49    89
Canada Life   5,622    499  5,048    661 4,387 3,958    70    91
Pearl        47,541  4,303 41,247  5,856 35,391 33,273  70    91
M&E Network     319    179    115     29    86    84    26    92
Equitable 
Life          7,629  1,964  5,274  1,804 3,470 3,240    42    92
Legal &
General      36,961 15,235 20,676  1,944 18,732 17,086  46    93
Allied 
Dunbar       19,654  4,286 14,531  3,850 10,681 10,146  52    93
Albany Life   3,105    713  2,268    216 2,052 1,963    63    93
Wesleyan      4,180    315  3,769    960 2,809 2,747    66    96
Royal London 13,532  1,167 12,363  1,546 10,816 10,791  80   100

A: cases identified as requiring review

B: of A, cases where investor was informed that information gained
during assessment excluded cases from review

C: number of assessments completed

D:  cases where the investor has been informed that no redress
is due.  

E: cases where redress has been offered

F:  cases where redress has been accepted. 

G:  cases where redress has been accepted as a percentage of cases
identified for review ((F/A)x100).

H: cases completed, including exclusions, as a percentage of cases
identified for review (((B+D+F)/A)x100).  



# = pounds sterling