# = pounds sterling

HM Treasury News Release
152/98                                       21 September 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------

             MORE EFFORT NEEDED IN PENSIONS REVIEW:
                         PATRICIA HEWITT

There has been further progress in dealing with priority cases
among the firms, involved in personal pensions mis-selling,
monitored by the Treasury, Economic Secretary Patricia Hewitt
said today.

Of the 29 firms, whose results to the end of August are published
today, only seven have resolved less than 75 per cent of their
priority cases. Four of the those seven are networks of
independent financial advisers. In March only 7 of the firms
monitored by the Treasury had resolved over 75 per cent of their
cases.

Ms Hewitt said:

     "These results show what can be accomplished when real
     effort is put in by the firms. Every one of these firms
     must now focus on the deadline of the end of the year
     for completing their priority reviews. I want all these
     firms to demonstrate to their customers, in the most
     practical way possible, that they are putting things
     right."

The Treasury's published figures mainly relate to cases involving
older investors, including those who have retired. In August the
Financial Services Authority (FSA) published guidelines on how
firms should review cases of younger investors. 

Commenting on the FSA's initiative, the Minister said:

     "It is now time for firms to start gearing up for the
     second phase of work on remedying mis-selling of
     personal pensions. I want to see all firms prepared and
     ready to go at the start of next year. There must be
     no return to the foot dragging which accompanied the
     start of the phase I review.

     "And frankly I am appalled at the attitude of some
     independent financial advisers to the task ahead. Their
     campaign to stop the phase 2 review shows a total
     disregard for their customers' welfare and does them
     no credit."


NOTES TO EDITORS

1.   The figures published today are mainly priority cases as
defined by the FSA.

2.   Recent fines, related to pensions mis-selling, levied by the
Personal Investment Authority include:

------------------------------------------------------
    					       Pounds
-------------------------------------------------------
     The M&E Network            Aug 1997      100,000
     DBS Financial Management 	Sep 1997      425,000
     Friends Provident          Sep 1997      450,000
     Albany Life                Nov 1997      375,000
     London & Manchester      	Jan 1998      525,000
     Countrywide                Feb 1998      250,000
     Britannic Assurance        Mar 1998      525,000
     Sun Life of Canada         Apr 1998      600,000
     Financial Options          June 1998     250,000
     Lincoln                    June 1998     70,000
     J&H Marsh & McLennan       June 1998     200,000
     Minet Consultancy Services July 1998     250,000
--------------------------------------------------------

3.   In addition, in July and August 1998, PIA fined 87 firms of
independent financial advisers a total of 335,750 Pounds.

4.   If you have access to the Internet, you can find this news
release and other Treasury material at
http://www.hm.treasury.gov.uk 

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
PROGRESS BY PENSIONS FIRMS IN RESOLVING CASES OF PERSONAL
PENSIONS MIS-SELLING IN THE PERIOD TO THE END OF AUGUST 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------
50-75% of cases resolved

DBS		2,344	802	692	167	499	369	16	57
Countrywide	4,985	2,554	310	193	117	104	2	57
Financial 
Options		460	213	61	23	38	30	7	58
Burns Anderson	1,245	418	413	195	218	173	14	63
Gan Life 	12,213	2,021	8,079	840	7,239	5,866	48	71
Abbey Life	17,695	5,609	8,008	1,208	6,800	5,934	34	72
Windsor Life	9,620	3,790	3,683	310	3,373	2,857	30	72

Over 75% of cases resolved
Lincoln
National	13,458	2,123	9,334	1,344	7,990	6,588	49	75
London and 
Manchester	8,568	1,459	5,456	640	4,816	4,368	51	75
IFA Network	372	118	165	110	55	53	14	76
Hill Samuel	6,196	906	4,355	698	3,657	3,217	52	78
Colonia		8,721	3,018	4,518	531	3,987	3,357	38	79
Berkeley
Independent	186	119	33	24	9	6	3	80
Standard Life	7,413	868	5,342	1,248	4,094	3,825	52	80
Sedgwick	16,809	9,200	4,781	1,754	3,027	2,700	16	81
CIS		44,681	6,757	33,540	13,744	19,796	15,997	36	82
Friends
Provident	7,083	1,206	4,973	783	4,190	3,813	54	82
NatWest		15,396	4,817	8,986	1,227	7,741	6,733	44	83
Canada Life	5,632	452	4,852	643	4,209	3,703	66	85
Albany Life 	3,105	716	2,229	214	2,015	1,751	56	86
Sun Life
of Canada	28,620	12,679	13,397	2,511	10,886	9,555	33	86
Hogg Robinson	2,287	828	1,237	427	809	731	32	87
Equitable Life	7,629	1,948	5,150	1,787	3,363	3,052	40	89
Allied Dunbar	19,655	4,244	14,194	3,793	10,401	9,491	48	89
M&E Network	323	178	113	29	83	81	25	89
Pearl		47,541	4,181	40,680	5,819	34,861	32,527	68	89
Legal &
General		36,929	15,200	20,265	1,935	18,330	16,528	45	91
Wesleyan	4,182	312	3,742	986	2,756	2,642	63	94
Royal London	13,532	1,164	12,349	1,538	10,811	10,554	78	98
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------------
A: cases identified asrequiring review

B: of A, cases where investor was informed that information gained during
assessment excluded casesfrom review

C: number of assessmentscompleted

D:  cases where the investor has been informed that no redress is due.  

E: cases where redress has been offered

F:  cases where redress has been accepted. 

G:  cases where redress has been accepted as a percentage of cases identified 
for review ((F/A)x100).

H: cases completed, including exclusions, as a percentage of cases identified 
for review (((B+D+F)/A)x100).