HM Treasury News Release
80/97                                             9 July 1997
________________________________________________________________

         PENSION COMPANIES FAIL TO DELIVER COMPENSATION


Figures published today by the Economic Secretary, Helen
Liddell, reveal that performance by the 24 pension companies
compensating those missold pensions is slower than expected.

This is the first set of figures, to be published on a monthly
basis, to show how firms are progressing compensation cases
for victims of personal pensions misselling.

The figures show that only two companies have managed to
compensate over 10 per cent of their cases and two companies
failed to compensate in less than one per cent of their cases.

Publishing the figures, in response to a Parliamentary
Question from Stephen Timms [East Ham], Mrs Liddell said:

     "The volume of cases cleared is extremely disappointing.
All the firms in the table have a great deal more work to
do. Some appear hardly to have begun.

     "It is now imperative that all firms - not just these 24
- which have sold personal pension should make serious 
efforts to improve the performance in completing their
caseloads. This is not only in the interests of their 
customers but also of their own reputations with the general 
public.

     "I will decide once I have seen some further figures to
measure progress what further action may be called for."

NOTES TO EDITORS

1.   The text of the parliamentary question and answer is
attached.

2.   If you have access to the Internet you can find this news
release at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk. Other Treasury
material can also be found at this address.



HMT REF: 0769W 97/98                   FOR ANSWER ON 09 JULY
1997



175   Mr Stephen Timms



LA - EAST HAM


To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what progress has been
made towards providing redress for the victims of misselling of
personal pensions.       [7904]

MRS HELEN LIDDELL

In my earlier reply to my hon Friend the Member for East Ham (Mr
Timms) on 24 June, (OR, WA, Cols 454-5) I undertook to publish
information each month about the cases handled by the 24 firms
which have most cases to review.  These are the firms for which
the regulators (the Securities and Investments Board and the
Personal Investment Authority) have published targets for
completion of case reviews.  Below is a table containing the
information provided to me by these firms about progress with
their casework to end June.

The figures in the table, which are those submitted by the 24
firms themselves, provide a benchmark from which future progress
can be measured .

The volume of cases cleared is extremely disappointing.  All the
firms in the table have a great deal more work to do.  Some
appear hardly to have begun.
 It is now imperative that all firms - not just these 24 - which
         have sold personal
pensions should make serious efforts to improve their performance
in completing their caseloads.  This is not only in the interests
of their customers but also of their own reputations with the
general public.  The regulators will continue to monitor the
firms' performance against the targets they have been set.

I will decide once I have seen some further figures to measure
progress what further action may be called for.


PENSION FIRM STATISTICS AS AT END JUNE 1997

Name of Company             A     B      C     D     E   F

Hogg Robinson             602    50      8     2     1   0

Colonial                 6754   152    663   503    32   0

Gan                      8358    43    133    79    63   1

Sedgwick                 6731   359    436   262    64   1

Abbey Life              15993   950   1116   238   169   1

Allied Dunbar           16422  1177    761   281   182   1

Lincoln National        12301   830    541   203   148   1

Windsor Life             7830     0    164   157   131   2

London & Manchester      6944    64    493   399   117   2

Cooperative Insurance   41762  1025   7195  1280   825   2

Equitable Life          10761  4097   3788   437   307   3

Britannic               12360     0   1355   728   443   4

Sun Life of Canada      25682  1628   1279  1161  1002   4

NatWest                 13192  2657   1801  1059   573   4

United Assurance        12648   382   1521   783   585   5

Pearl                   39548   897   4486  3040   2076  5

Prudential              58606    35  13829 12861   3128  5

Royal London            9357    138   1280   748    532  6

Legal & General        33282  12147   3442  2590   2046  6

Norwich Union           6772   1824   1009   548    428  6

Lloyds/TSB             46562   4662   6836  5166   3310  7

Royal Sun Alliance     14995    927   1933  1605   1213  8

Guardian                8225    264   1511  1175    855 10

Barclays Life          16700   5134   4413  3121   2315 14


A: cases identified as requiring review
B: of A, cases where investor was informed that information
   gained during assessment excluded cases from review
C: number of assessments completed
D: cases where redress has been offered
E: cases where redress has been accepted. This is a subset of
   assessments completed
F: cases where redress has been accepted as a percentage of
   cases identified   for review. Some further cases will have
   been completed without redress being due.