HM Treasury News Release
117/97                                       7 October 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------


           HELEN LIDDELL MEETS VICTIMS OF MIS-SELLING

Two victims of personal pensions mis-selling today met with
the Economic Secretary, Helen Liddell to discuss their cases.

Stella Gardner, a home care officer from Poole,Dorset and
Christine Culbert, a school administrative assistant from
London told the Minister about their experiences of trying to
get redress from the pension companies.

Following the meeting, Mrs Liddell said:

     "This is the human face of pensions mis-selling. The
     statistics tell a grim tale but cannot give a true
     picture of just how much distress is caused. However,at
     last, it is heartening to meet people who have taken
     their complaints forward and - finally - received the
     redress they deserve. Their experiences illustrate the
     need for all firms involved in mis-selling to start
     looking after their customers. Delays and buck passing
     must stop.

     "The very best customer care must be deployed if the
industry is to regain the trust of its customers ."

The Minister urged people to check their pension provisions
and if they believe they have a complaint, to pursue it. With
compensation payments averaging 7,500 Pounds being made into
people's pension funds, it could make a real difference to
their pension entitlement.

     She said:

     "We all get a lot of junk mail and it is very easy for
     questionnaires from pension firms on the review to get
     overlooked. If your company is requesting information
     please reply. 

     "Don't be put off: where it is due, redress will be
     made."

When she met 17 firms in September, Mrs Liddell asked each
firm to provide a statement setting out the policy they had
adopted and the practical plans they had made to complete
their reviews and better the targets set for them by the
Personal Investment Authority (PIA).  These plans will be
published later this week.  The 17 firms have also provided
the first monthly update on the progress they have achieved.

These figures, which cover the period to the end of September,
were published alongside information provided by the 24 firms
with the most cases to review.

The September figures show that:

*    5 of the 41 firms have resolved over half their cases;

*    25 firms have resolved between 25-50 per cent of cases;
     and

*    11 firms have resolved under 25 per cent.

On the figures, the Minister said:

     "I want the public to have information to help people
     judge for themselves just how committed each firm is to
     achieving real progress."

     "The latest figures illustrate in stark terms how
     important it is that firms pull out all the stops.
     Clearly it is possible to make progress, though some
     firms are still lagging far behind."

NOTES TO EDITORS

1.   In May 1997 the Securities and Investments Board (SIB)
and the Personal Investment Authority (PIA) launched a
national advertising campaign to raise awareness of the
pensions review among those potentially affected. As part of
their on-going campaign the SIB and PIA have published a
number of case histories to illustrate how individuals who
were missold a personal pension have benefited from having
their pension reviewed.  A copy of the case studies is
attached. 

2.   Information on the review in the form of a SIB factsheet
can be obtained from freephone 0800 003 007.

3.   PIA's Pension Helpline on 0171 417 7001 is available for
people who need advice.

4.   Mrs Liddell met with the 24 firms with most cases to
review on 14 May. Beginning on 9 July, the Treasury has been
publishing information on a monthly basis on how fast they are
dealing with cases. The Minister met with representatives of a
further 17 firms on 18 September. Figures for end September
for all 41 firms are in the table attached.

5.   So far, the regulators have imposed a number of fines for
offences connected with personal pensions cases.  Recent fines
include :

August 1997    The M&E Network was fined 100,000 Pounds by PIA and
               reprimanded for its failure to take all
               reasonable steps to carry out the review of its
               past pensions business in accordance with the
               standards prescribed by PIA. In particular, the
               firm had delayed the mailing of pensions review
               questionnaires to its clients, which is an
               essential first step in the pensions review
               process. The firm was also ordered to pay costs
               of 25,000 Pounds

September 1997 DBS Financial Management Ltd was fined 425,000 Pounds
               and reprimanded by PIA after it admitted
               failing to take all reasonable steps to carry
               out its review of past pension business and to
               monitor the review of pensions business
               transacted by its representatives prior to
               joining DBS. The firm was also required to pay
               costs of 19,450 Pounds.

September 1997 Friends Provident was fined 450,000 Pounds and
               reprimanded by PIA for failing to take all
               reasonable steps to carry out its review of
               past pensions business or to monitor the review
               by other businesses for which it has
               responsibility.  The firm was ordered to pay
               PIA's costs of 20,000 Pounds.

September 1997 Midland Bank was fined 150,000 Pounds by the
               Investment Management Regulatory Organisation
               (IMRO) for failing to provide customers with
               all the necessary information to help them make
               a balanced and informed decision about whether
               to carry out a pension transfer.  The firm was
               ordered to pay IMRO's investigation costs of
               70,708 Pounds and a contribution to the disciplinary
               costs.

6.   If you have access to the Internet you can find this
information at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk. Material on
other Treasury issues can also be found at this site.


Table 1
			A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H

Under 25% of cases resolved

DBS			352	0	0	0	5	0	0	0
Gan			9,936	138	432	184	248	180	2	5
Lincoln National	12,667	916	1,126	486	640	212	2	13
Brittanic		14,780	42	2,892	1,376	1,516	1,091	7	17
Sun Life of Canada	25,806	2,937	1,938	246	1,692	1,278	5	17
Countrywide		485	64	35	20	3	1	0	18
Canada Life		5,404	97	1095	271	824	582	11	18
Windsor Life		8,262	1,264	392	26	366	259	3	19
Friends Provident	6,433	705	848	182	666	514	8	22
London and Manchester	7,693	450	1,959	274	1,685	1,041	14	23
Godwins			1,358	8	344	215	129	100	7	24

25-50% of cases resolved
Financial Options	243	62	1	0	1	0	0	26
United Assurance	12,264	607	3,130	1,026	2,104	1,505	12	26
Burns Anderson		384	32	76	58	21	14	4	27
CIS			43,339	1,835	11,715	8,744	2,971	1,403	3	28
Royal London		10,211	862	2,555	937	1,618	1,033	10	28
IFA Network		520	82	65	62	3	3	1	28
Royal & Sun Alliance	15,182	1,412	3,720	552	3,168	2,369	16	29
Pearl			40,233	1,644	17,716	3,667	14,049	6,360	16	29
Allied Dunbar		17,128	2,133	3,644	1,717	1,927	1,341	8	30
Hill Samuel		5,813	560	1595	412	1183	815	14	31
Albany Life 		2,833	377	1174	81	1093	417	15	31
Colonial		7,856	1,631	1,569	185	1,384	812	10	33
Sedgwick		9,821	2,328	1,293	553	740	459	5	34
Abbey Life		17,044	3,368	3,109	681	2,428	1,806	11	34
Standard Life		6,410	260	2,098	865	1,233	1,081	17	34
Prudential		69,198	11,155	22,546	2,241	20,305	11,604	17	36
Guardian		8,619	618	3,288	602	2,686	1,989	23	37
NatWest			13,707	3,204	2,764	705	2,059	1,370	10	39
Commercial Union	7,132	727	2384	655	1729	1369	19	39
Midland			4,711	327	1,928	335	1,593	1,195	25	39
Wesleyan		4,110	190	1822	498	1235	975	24	40
Berkeley Independent	68	27	0	0	1	1	1	41
Lloyd's TSB		47,477	7,138	13,608	3,813	9,795	8,890	19	42
Hogg Robinson		1,743	541	354	87	267	109	6	42
Norwich Union		6,987	1,955	1,622	513	1,109	885	13	48

Over 50% of cases resolved
AXA Equity and Law	3,825	635	1667	663	1004	866	23	57
Legal & General		34,576	13,034	8,935	1,214	7,721	5,316	15	57
M&E Network		266	146	32	10	22	13	5	64
Barclays		16,741	5,625	6,331	1,661	4,650	3,657	22	65
Equitable Life		11,038	5,545	2,059	1,036	1,023	724	7	66

A: cases identified as requiring review
B: of A, cases where investor was informed that information gained during assessment excluded cases from review
C: number of assessments completed
D:  cases where the investor has been informed that no redress is due.  
E: cases where redress has been offered
F:  cases where redress has been accepted. 
G:  cases where redress has been accepted as a percentage of cases identified for review ((F/A)x100).
H: cases completed, including exclusions, as a percentage of cases identified for review (((B+D+F)/A)x100).