HM Treasury News Release
110/97                                       18 September 1997
_______________________________________________________________

           HELEN LIDDELL SEES MORE PENSIONS FIRMS

Senior representatives from 17 more firms involved in
misselling of personal pensions were today called to a meeting
at the Treasury with Economic Secretary, Helen Liddell.

The Minister told the companies that they must get to work and
urgently review cases and put matters right where necessary.

Speaking following the meeting, Mrs Liddell said:

     "No-one gets off the hook where misselling of personal
     pensions may have occurred. Every firm must get on with 
     the urgent job of reviewing cases and  provide redress 
     where it is due.

     "My postbag is overflowing with letters from people
     frustrated at the long delays they have encountered. It is 
     a public scandal that these people have had to wait so long
     for help."

This meeting follows a similar one in May when the Minister
met with the top 24 firms. Mrs Liddell today again urged
companies to speed up their review of cases and better the
targets set by the Personal Investment Authority (PIA). 

The Minister also published the third monthly table on the
progress of the top 24 firms with cases outstanding. The table
shows considerable variation in the firms' performance, with
some companies making real efforts to resolve cases, while
others lag behind.

Commenting on the figures, the Minister said:

     "The figures this month are mixed. Some firms have
     started to make real progress while others are still very
     disappointing.

     "I will not allow this issue to go away until the
     companies have fulfilled their responsibilities."




Notes to Editors

1.   Mrs Liddell met the 24 firms with most cases on 14 May. 
     The Treasury publishes monthly information about how fast
     they are dealing with their cases.  The figures for end
     August are in table 1 attached.

2.   The remaining 17 firms from the top 41, which Mrs Liddell
     saw today, are listed in table 2 together with the
     deadlines set by the Personal Investment Authority (PIA)
     on 18 September. 

3.   So far the PIA has imposed the following fines for
     offences connected with processing of personal pensions
     cases:
   
April 1997:         Berkeley Independent Advisers Limited was
                    fined 70,000 Pounds and reprimanded after
                    it admitted that it had failed to take all
                    reasonable steps to ensure that its
                    representative firms conduct pensions
                    reviews in accordance with the standards
                    established by PIA.  The firm was also
                    ordered to pay costs of 15,000 Pounds.

August 1997:        The M&E Network was fined 100,000 Pounds
                    and reprimanded for its failure to take
                    all reasonable steps to carry out the
                    review of its past pensions business in
                    accordance with the standards prescribed
                    by PIA.  In particular, the firm had
                    delayed the mailing of pensions review
                    questionnaires to its clients, which is an
                    essential first step in the pensions
                    review process.  The firm was also ordered
                    to pay costs of 25,000 Pounds.

September 1997:     DBS Financial Management Ltd was fined
                    425,000 Pounds and reprimanded by PIA
                    after it admitted failing to take all
                    reasonable steps to carry out its review
                    of past pension business and to monitor
                    the review of pensions business transacted
                    by its representatives prior to joining
                    DBS.  The firm was also required to pay
                    costs of 19,450 Pounds. 

4.   Sarah Modlock of the PIA press office can be reached on
          0171 418 5231



Table 1

                         A      B      C      D      E      F    G    H   

Gan                    9,419     60    270     95    175    113   1    3   
Lincoln National      12,592    885    608    388    220    174   1   11
Britannic             13,508      0  2,229  1,107  1,122    806   6   14
Sun Life of Canada    25,706  2,983  1,525    158  1,367  1,096   4   16
London and Manchester  7,513    361  1,389    207  1,182    672   9   17
Royal London           9,507    195  1,761    665  1,096    767   8   17
United Assurance      12,141    525  1,870    805  1,065    855   7   18
Hogg Robinson          1,583    252    154     33    121     10   1   19
Pearl                 39,824  1,111 11,035  2,137  8,898  4,131  10   19
Windsor Life           8,237  1,331    277     16    261    184   2   19
Sedgwick               9,818  1,509    840    419    421    247   3   22
Allied Dunbar         17,018  1,763  2,508  1,255  1,253    845   5   23
Prudential            60,724  2,756 18,279  1,537 16,742  9,971  16   23
CIS                   42,514  1,472  9,190  7,358  1,832  1,243   3   24
Royal & Sun Alliance  15,143  1,296  2,990    483  2,507  2,005  13   25
Abbey Life            16,570  2,804  2,341    553  1,788  1,034   6   26
Colonial               7,789  1,500  1,183    135  1,048    576   7   28
Guardian               8,500    532  2,652    525  2,127  1,498  18   30
Lloyd's TSB           47,225  6,145 11,857  3,201  8,576  6,648  14   34
NatWest               13,590  3,044  2,181    647  1,634  1,207   9   36
Norwich Union          6,944  1,857  1,311    471    840    713  10   44
Legal & General       33,389 12,532  6,080  1,075  5,005  3,138   9   50
Equitable Life        10,894  4,177  1,691    898    793    512   5   51
Barclays              16,725  5,471  5,495  1,516  3,979  3,281  20   61


A:   cases identified as requiring review
B:   of A, cases where investor was informed that information 
     gained during assessment excluded cases from review
C:   number of assessments completed
D:   cases where the investor has been informed that no redress 
     is due
E:   cases where redress has been offered
F:   cases where redress has been accepted
G:   cases where redress has been accepted as a percentage of 
     cases identified for review
     ((F/A) x 100)
H    cases completed, including exclusions, as a percentage of 
     cases identified for review ((B+D+F)/A) x 100)




Table 2

                          PIA required completion date for : 

                            90% of priority      100% of all
                              tranche 1         priority cases

Albany Life                   30 Sep 1997         30 Sep 1998
AXA Equity and Law            31 Dec 1997         30 Jun 1998
Berkeley Independent          31 Dec 1997         31 Dec 1998
Burns Anderson                31 Dec 1997         31 Dec 1998
Canada Life                   31 Dec 1997         30 Sep 1998
Commercial Union              31 Dec 1997         30 Jun 1998
Countrywide                   31 Dec 1997         31 Dec 1998
DBS                           31 Dec 1997         31 Dec 1998
Financial Options/Investment 
Options                       31 Dec 1997         30 Jun 1998
Friends Provident             31 Dec 1997         31 Dec 1998
Godwins                       31 Dec 1997         30 Jun 1998
Hill Samuel                   31 Dec 1997         31 Dec 1998
IFA Network                   31 Dec 1997         30 Jun 1998
Midland                       30 Nov 1997         31 May 1998
M&E                           30 Sep 1997         30 June 1998
Standard Life                 31 Dec 1997         31 Dec 1998
Wesleyan                      31 Dec 1997         30 Sep 1998