HM Treasury (1278 bytes)

home | news | site index

FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000

REPEALS, TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS AND SAVINGS

DECEMBER 2000


back to contents

PART IX - TRIBUNALS

New cases to be referred to the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal

9.1       Where, at any time after commencement, a person is subjected to a sanction in respect of misconduct occurring before commencement, then, if he would have a right to appeal against the sanction or to refer the case to a tribunal, that right will be preserved.  However, the right to make a reference would become a right to refer the matter to the new Financial Services and Markets Tribunal established under Part IX of FSMA.  In some cases, where the jurisdiction of the old tribunal which would have reviewed the case was limited in some way, or it was required to adopt particular procedures, the new Financial Services and Markets Tribunal, when taking over the case, will be subject to the same limitation or will be required to adopt the same procedures.  In this way, we will avoid the need to keep a number of old tribunals running over a long period beyond commencement whilst at the same time respecting the rights and expectations of the parties to the proceedings.

9.2       The basis on which the Tribunal reviewing a proposed action under old law is able to reach a finding will depend on the circumstances of the case.  In broad terms, where there is a disciplinary case, and the substance of the case is essentially whether a particular breach happened or whether a proposed sanction was appropriate, the Tribunal will seek to establish the facts and may either uphold the regulatory decisions or direct the FSA to take appropriate action in place of the action it had proposed to take.

9.3            However, where the case before the Tribunal required it to consider whether a person was fit and proper, for example in relation to a decision not to grant an authorisation,  to impose restrictions on an authorisation, or to revoke it, we believe that it would be pointless for the Tribunal to reach a view based on the requirements that applied under old law.  We therefore propose that in such cases, the Tribunal, in examining the case should seek to use the hearing to establish whether, in FSMA terms, there is a question over a person's fitness, and accordingly whether their authorisation should granted, restricted or revoked, as the case may be.

Continuation of proceedings started before commencement

9.4       After careful consideration, we have concluded that where a case has already been referred to an existing tribunal before commencement, the only sensible approach is to allow the case to run its course before that tribunal.  We reach the same view even in cases where the hearing has not started, given that extensive preparations will be made by the parties sometime before the hearing.  To change track at a late stage would be unduly disruptive and impose unnecessary costs.

9.5       For the statutory tribunals, that is those under the Banking Act and FS Act, we will make appropriate savings of old law to enable them to complete the hearing.  (Similar provision is made in the Mutuals Order for the tribunals established by the Building Societies Act 1986 and the Friendly Societies Act 1992.)

9.6       For the SROs, it will be necessary to recreate a transitional jurisdiction under which the FSA will continue those tribunals until all relevant cases have been heard.  (If the hearing could subsequently give rise to a right of appeal, the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal will have a special jurisdiction to hear the appeal.)

9.7            However, in a case where an old tribunal determines a reference or appeal requested prior to commencement, we need to make sure it has power to make orders and impose sanctions which make sense in the new regime - for example, there is no point in the tribunal purporting to expel a firm from membership of an SRO which has ceased to exist.  Where appropriate, therefore, the tribunal will be empowered to direct the FSA to take action which is appropriate in FSMA terms, subject to the caveat that the action cannot be more severe than would have been possible under the old regime.


line.gif (378 bytes)

© Crown Copyright | home